The Holocaust in Slovakia 2 (President, Government, Assembly and the
State Council on the Jewish Question). Documents. Preface.
The persecution of the Jewish
population in Slovakia in the period from 1939/1945 is one of the most
frequently discussed problems of the domestic politics of the Slovak Republic
of that time. It permanently impacted all areas of public and social life. The
highest constitutional authorities systematically and purposefully dealt with
its agenda, initiated and directed it. Since its establishment the state had
fought a domestic war against 89,000 local Jewish citizens whom they labeled as
an “alien force”, as a permanent enemy of the Slovak state[1],
as a nation with an incurable disease that wants to live at the expense of
other nations.”[2] As a result
of these earlier assessments, Jewish citizens were gradually deprived of their
economic, social, civil, and ultimately of their basic human rights as well.
This trend necessarily and logically led to the tragedy resulting in the
deportation and subsequent extermination of three quarters of Slovak Jews.
The highest constitutional
authorities, who conscientiously initiated, realized, propagated, as well as
approved of all the anti-Semitic measures issued by the state, bore direct as
well as indirect, political and moral responsibility for this development (even
though the degree of their responsibility varied according to the actual steps
undertaken by them). The tragedy of the Jewish citizens did not begin in the
trains deporting them. It did not even start at the gates of the extermination
camps or gas chambers – this was “only” where they reached their culmination
point. Its pernicious roots should be looked for in the dissemination of the
malevolent anti-Semitic propaganda that was advanced and directed by the state;
in the first anti-Semitic steps that were given a monstrous legal underpinning
by the laws and decrees; that were ideologically justified and backed up by the
fictitious vital interests of the Slovak state and nation, sometimes even by
religious reasons.
The highest constitutional
legislative, as well as executive, institutions of the wartime Slovak state
were: the Assembly, the Government, the President and the State Council. All
these authorities participated to an extensive degree in the anti-Semitic
politics of the state – regardless of the fact whether their members had the
same opinion on this problem or if they foresaw the consequences of “the
solution” of the Jewish question. Encroachments of the constitutional authorities
were either direct (the enactment and especially the enforcement of hundreds of
laws, decrees and regulations); or indirect: mandatory official assumption of
the attitude towards the legal, political as well as moral anti-Semitic
politics of the state; approval, justification, explanation and sometimes
criticism of these policies. Despite their varying position or authority, the
highest constitutional authorities of the state were mutually interlinked on
the level of personnel as well as of their competencies because their members
belonged to the highest group of officials, they shared the same ideology as
well as the everyday political practice of the governing state-party – the HSĽS. The first Prime
Minister (later president) J. Tiso was also a chairman of HSĽS, the “leader of the nation”. The second Prime
Minister, V. Tuka, like the chairman of the Assembly, M. Sokol, belonged to the elite leadership of the HSĽS, as well
as to the State Council. Most
ministers, representatives and members of the State Council simultaneously held
high positions in the governing state-party, whose leading position in the
state was rooted in the Constitution and thus bore full responsibility for
everything that was going on in the state – i.e. also for the anti-Jewish politics
and its tragic consequences. Moreover, the solution of the Jewish question had
become an instrument frequently used in
fighting on the level of competencies, power and personnel among the
above-mentioned constitutional authorities or among their highest
representatives. Sometimes it is quite difficult to identify statements and
actions of the highest constitutional representatives – from the point of their
state as well as party functions.
From
the constitutional point of view it was logically presumed that the main
decision in the so-called “solution of the Jewish question” would be made by
the Assembly that was responsible for “enacting laws which would solve the
Jewish question in Slovakia” and thus this institution was supposed to “get
great credit for the healthy development of the nation”[3].
However, the Slovak Assembly did not participate in the solution of the Jewish
question to the extent as had originally been intended, although several of the
legal norms passed by it played a key role in this area. Among these are: “the
Land Reform Act”, “Jewish Enterprises and Jewish Employment Act” (the so-called
“First Arianization Act”)[4],
“the Execution Act” and mainly the constitutional acts authorising the
Government in the solution of “the Jewish question” or the deportation of Jews
from the territory of the Slovak Republic.[5]
By
passing anti-Semitic regulations the Assembly helped to initiate and legalize
not only the mechanism of anti-Jewish policy in the everyday practice of the
regime, but also in the name of the accepted ideology they intentionaly reneged
on their fundamental mission, i.e., protection of the law. Last of all, the
representatives themselves admitted it when they commented that “(…) the legal
order is (in the course of the solution of the Jewish question – editors’ note)
broken here only to such an extent as the aim requires[6].
(…) Nowadays we live in such times that the directives of the constitutional
act must very often be eliminated”[7]
(…) “In the spirit of the new Europe we needed to pass many new laws and
decrees in Slovakia and the Slovak Parliament, in agreement, with the head of
the state and the Government, tried to put their stamp of approval on them.”.[8]
Since 1943 the Asembly of the Slovak Republic partially tried to revise some of
their own legal norms, but especially the governmental anti-Jewish ones,
because “at the moment when they authorized the Government, nobody in the
Assembly thought of such a solution of the Jewish question as it later turned
out to be”.[9] However, these
endeavours at revision never did touch upon the moral essence of the so-called
“solution of the Jewish question”. They only vainly tried to rectify some of
the economic damage that accompanied the arianization process. The legitimacy
of the anti-Semitic politics of the state was never challenged in the Assembly;
only their methods were critised. The Parliament, like the rest of the highest
constitutional authorities of the state, never found the political courage or
moral power to revise the anti-Jewish ideological doctrine and its practical
consequences.[10]
The
key role in the process of enforcing of anti-Jewish proceedings was played by
the Government and its state authorities or its lower institutions, such as the
Office of Propaganda, the Economic Office of the Presidium of the Government,
the Central Economic Office, Department of the Ministry of Interior number 14,
the Central Job Centre, etc. (Other volumes of this documentary series still in
preparation will deal with the anti-Jewish activities of the above-mentioned
institutions – e.g. deportations, aryanization, Jewish labour camps, etc.).
Although there was a great diversity of opinion among its individual members,
the Government was not only the body enforcing the anti-Jewish measures, but
also initiated them. The absolute majority of anti-Semitic legal norms were
issued in the form of governmental decrees or decrees with power of the law as
well as in the form of regulations from the individual ministries. Their
initiators and authors openly declared their rejection of the principles of
democratic liberal legislation and claimed that “the same laws can apply to all
people only then when all of them are of the same opinion and of the same moral
principles.… The same laws cannot be applied to cannibals and civilised people,
that is why they cannot apply to the Jews and others.[11]
Immediately
on March 14, 1939, the Government was vested with the authority to “perform all
that is required for keeping order and securing the interests of the Slovak
State in the period of transformation”.[12]
The same power was given to the Government by §44 of the Constitution – in
cases when “(…) the economic, financial
or political interest of the state requires it (…)”.[13]
Although the Assembly had the power to veto governmental decrees for up to
three moths, in the case of the anti-Jewish measures they never used this
right. On the basis of the above-mentioned authorisation, Jewish citizens were systematically excluded from public and economic
life and discriminated against on all social levels as early as in the first
year of the existence of the state. Regional, local, and notary authorities, as
well as the police, who were directly subordinate to the Government, were the
ones to take the actual steps in this process.
In the autumn of 1940, after
the partial reconstruction of the Slovak Government and after the infiltration
of the National-Socialistic ideology and its methods into political practice in
Slovakia, the Government assumed an even more important, and for some time
unwavering, position in “the solution” of the Jewish question. The Assembly
fully respected the Government’s position by passing the constitutional act
which gave the Government for one year full powers to completely exclude Jewish
citizens from Slovak economic and social life and to confiscate their property[14]
because “the solution of the Jewish question must be based on a completely new
foundation”; it must submit to “the speed of the present times”; and “in the
course of the solution of such a serious issue it is necessary to proceed
swiftly”.[15] This
constitutional act, number 210/1940, was signed by the president J. Tiso.
After the passage of the
enabling statute, hundreds of decrees and orders were issued in the course of a
year; these were inspired by the Presidium of the Government, individual
ministries or by the Central Economic Office. These steps not only concluded
the process of excluding Jews from economic and public life by confiscating all
their property, but they also deprived them of their basic civil, personal and
human rights. This trend culminated in September 1941 in the passage of the
so-called “Jewish Code” (decree number 198/1941 SlC) that became one of the
cruelest anti-Semitic laws in modern European history. Moreover, this law based
“the solution” of the Jewish question in the Slovak state on the principle of
race.[16]
Soon the Government, especially the Prime Minster and the Minister of Foreign
Affairs, Vojtech Tuka, and A. Mach, from his double position of Minister of
Interior and commander-in-chief of Hlinka’s Guard, started the actual
preparations that were immediately followed by execution of the deportations of
Slovak Jews into Nazi extermination camps. The above-mentioned governmental
officials not only participated in the forced expatriation of the Jews in the
course of its organization, but they had also been preparing this action and
justifying it in propaganda, presenting it as one of the main conditions of a
happy future for the state as well as for the nation. Likewise they justified
the deportations as a certain compensation for the lower number of Slovak
workers in the 3rd Reich or as a replacement for committing a higher
number of Slovak soldiers to the Eastern front. Although some Cabinet members
expressed some doubt about the legal and moral side of the deportations, after
the explanation of – or rather pressure from Tuka and Mach – “we did not put
forward any radical objections against it”[17]
(against the deportations – I.K., E.N.) The Cabinet, especially through the
Department of the Ministry of Interior number 14 (the so-called “Jewish
department”), stipulated the progress and pace of the transports; maintained
their general organization, expenses, transportation, etc. From March to
October 1942 there were 57,628 people deported from Slovakia to the
extermination camps, or about two thirds of the Jews living in the territory of
the Slovak Republic at that time. The Slovak Government paid 500.00 Reich marks
(about 5,000 Slovak crowns) to Germany for each deportee.[18]
However, the individual ministries as well as the Central Economic Office,
subordinate to the Presidium of the Government and later to the Ministry of
Economy, granted work permits that became a temporary but nevertheless
uncertain protection from the forced expatriation from the territory of the
state.
Even after the first phase of
deportations ended in the autumn of 1942, the Government continued to be the
most important constitutional authority directing further steps in “the
solution” of the Jewish question. The operational thesis was that it was
necessary “to take the strictest approach in dealing with the Jews (…)”,
because “(…) even though they have been granted dispensation, they are still a
dangerous ulcer on the body of Slovakia, destroyers of the healthy and sober
judgment of our people (…)” so that “if we are considerate towards them, we are
committing a crime against ourselves”.[19]
In spite of the fact that in the spring of 1943 some radical members of the
Government[20] attempted
to resume the deportations, they were not able to renew the transports.[21]
Under the supervision of the Government Jewish labor camps and centers were
built in Slovakia. The Government continued to supervise the observance of the
previous anti-Jewish discrimination decrees and performed repeated
registrations of the remaining Jews; they confirmed the Jews’ working permits
and unsuccessfully tried to remedy the increasing economic damage caused by the
aryanization process. In the spring of 1944 the remaining Jewish citizens from
the Šariš
and Zemplín Regions were forcibly evacuated to Central and Western Slovakia.
After the German occupation of the Slovak territory in
the autumn of 1944 the governmental authorities participated again not
only in the malevolent anti-Semitic propaganda, but also by participating in
the arrest and deportation of the remaining Slovak Jews into the Nazi
extermination and concentration camps and death marches.[22]
President
Jozef Tiso had also participated in the “solution” of the Jewish question from
October 1939 onwards. For almost sixty years there have been many passionate
debates in historiography, historical publications and in Slovak society about
the president’s legal, political and moral responsibility for the tragedy of
Slovak Jews. Many legends have been created, most of them originating from
ideological motives or the lack of knowledge of the facts of that time or their
context. The Constitution vested the president with ample possibilities to
intervene in the so-called solution of the Jewish question. The head of state
approved all the laws passed by the Assembly and could give his opinion on them
or return them to the Assembly for new deliberation. It is necessary to say
that president J. Tiso signed all the anti-Jewish laws (including
constitutional acts number 210/1940 SlC authorising the Government to “solve”
the Jewish question for one year and constitutional act number 68/1942 SlC –
allowing the deportation of Jews) and, with only one exception (in the case of
the law about Jewish business and Jews employed in these enterprises – 113/1940
SlC) he never interfered in their wording.[23]
Moreover, before October 1939, during his time as Prime Minister, J. Tiso
signed all the anti-Jewish decrees of the Government.[24]
Very
often the fact that J. Tiso did not sign the Jewish Code (decree number
198/1941 SlC) is cited. However, this regulation was in the form of a decree
passed within the bounds of the full authority vested in the Government
regarding “the solution” of the Jewish question. This authorisation of the
Government was based on constitutional act number 210/1941 SlC that was passed
by the Assembly of the Slovak Republic and signed by the president. Thus both
of the above-mentioned constitutional authorities gave total authority to the Government. Nevertheless, they
inevitably bear political responsibility for these measures. The President did not sign governmental or
other decrees, not even in “non-Jewish” matters, because the Constitution did
not assign him this task. However J. Tiso knew the text of the Jewish Code
before its enactment and through the presidential office he expressed his
opinion on it. He did not protest against its wording, but only reserved to
himself the right to grant dispensations from its vigor.[25]
He never publicly challenged the wording, or the racist and inhumane character
of this governmental decree. On the contrary, in many of his official speeches
or in public appearances J. Tiso justified and approved of all the anti-Jewish
measures, including deportations. He explained them in the context of
fictitious interests of the nation and of the country, even citing religious
reasons for this. “I will not let the nation perish because of the Jewish
commonality. Nation means more for me than Jews. I will say it in a Christian
way – first me and then you…”[26]
Is what is happening to the Jews Christian? Is it human? It would have looked
even worse if we had not cleansed ourselves of them in time. And we have done
it according to God’s commandment.”[27]
The President deliberately renounced his original promises and resolutions
that “(…) they will not proceed with hatred, roughly and
brutally”[28] in the course of “the
solution” of the Jewish question. It is astounding that even in the autumn of 1944 J. Tiso defended his
attitude towards the persecution of the Jewish population in a letter addressed
to Pope Pius XII, in which he claimed that “(…) Jews have had a very
comfortable life in the five years of the existence of the Slovak Republic,”
despite this fact they have incited uprisings against the state. He also marked
reports “(…) about the cruel measures undertaken by the Government in
opposition to the principles of humanity towards persons because of their
nationality and religion” as an act of hostile propaganda. He explained and
justified the deportations as “(…) freeing Jews for work in Germany.”[29]
The President’s political responsibility for the “solution” of the Jewish
question grew due to the fact that J. Tiso was a member of the leadership of
the only governing state-party, and from this position he was also a
commander-in-chief of Hlinka’s Guard, which participated to a great degree in
the brutal realization of the anti-Semitic decrees until the end of the
existence of the Slovak Republic. The president’s moral responsibility arises
from the fact that as a priest, with indisputable authority in the society,
approved of the state’s anti-Jewish policies, justifying them by fictitious
religious motives.
The State Council which,
according to the original concept, should have been one of the most important
constitutional authorities of the state with far-reaching controlling authority
(a certain kind of “Upper House” of the Slovak Parliament[30]),
was sometimes also confronted with the process of “the solution” of the Jewish
question in Slovakia. Members of the State Council, who represented political,
economic, cultural as well as Church elites of the society at this forum,
commented on this problem only occasionally but usually only on the most
delicate issues, such as aryanization and mainly the deportations of Jews to
the extermination camps. Regarding its actual authority, in the totalitarian
regime the State Council was basically degraded to the level of a
non-obligatory consultative constitutional body. Despite this fact they could
also have some small influence on the course of “the solution” of the Jewish
question by expressing their opinion and by their declared moral authority.
Nonetheless, this institution did not challenge the “justifiability” of
discrimination against or persecution of Jewish citizens because “the Jewish
population breaks down the social order through its world organization and
undermines civilization and the dignity of humankind by its Bolshevism … The
Slovak nation should be cleansed from Jews immediately.”[31]
The State Council most often criticized some of the methods used by the state
authorities against the Jewish population, especially against the converts. In
the beginning this criticism was primarily aimed at the aryanization process,
which degenerated into corruption scandals and the uncontrollable damage of the
economic interests of the state: “There is no more national idealism in our
towns. The towns live in the atmosphere that the Jewish question is an issue of
those doing the aryanization and of their interests.”[32]
At the beginning of the
deportations in March 1942 there was a warning issued at the State Council
meeting that not only was this action incongruous with the economic interests
of the state but it also broke Slovak as well as international legal principles
and it also “(…) went against the natural law as well as God’s law and evoked
general scandal.”[33].
Nevertheless, after a heated discussion the State Council did not refuse to
allow the deportations to begin; they merely recommended that the president grant
dispensations especially to the converts and expressed their concern for space
for the deported Jewish converts to perform their religious duties in their
“new homes”[34]. In the
subsequent period the State Council offered their comments on the Jewish question
only sporadically, and they did not react at all to the new wave of
deportations in the autumn of 1944. One of its members characteristically
expressed its moral and political responsibility, and consequently the State
Council’s attitude towards the deportations or towards the whole solution of
the Jewish question: “Thank God that it is over. May they [the Jews - editors’
note] never return, not even in the future.”[35]
The highest constitutional
authorities of the Slovak Republic thus bear full, although distinct legal,
political and moral responsibility for the so-called “solution of the Jewish
question” in Slovakia and for its tragic consequences. The published materials
vividly account for, reconstruct and concurrently point out the tragedy of this
process that logically led to the mass murders and the subsequent trauma of the
Slovak society. The activity of these institutions from the aspect of their
personal structure was not monolithic in its views, nor unchangeable; however,
it was differential in its attitude towards the “solution” of the Jewish
question and underwent its own inner development, influenced by foreign as well
as domestic political and ideological factors.
Phases of the legal modifications of the Jewish question in the period of
the Slovak State
1.
From March
14, 1939 until the passage of the Constitution on July 21, 1939 anti-Jewish
regulations were passed in the form of governmental decrees based on act number
1/1939 SlC regarding the independent
Slovak State. In § 4 this law vested the Government with authority by means of decrees to
perform all that was deemed necessary for the preservation of public order and
for securing of the interests of the Slovak State in this transitional period.[36]
2.
From the
passage of the Constitution on July 21, 1939 until September 11, 1940 the
highest number of anti-Jewish regulations based on § 44 of the Constitution of
the Slovak Republic were passed in the form of decrees with force of the law.[37]
Only some anti-Jewish
regulations were passed in the form of laws in this period. It was especially
act number 113/1940 SlC regarding Jewish enterprises and Jews employed in
enterprises (the so-called “First Aryanization Act”) and act number 163/1940
SlC about the temporary regularization of executions and tenders that were
introduced thanks to Jewish proposals.
3.
The next
phase began on September 11, 1940 when constitutional act number 210/1942 SlC,
authorizing the Government for the period of one year “to solve” the issue of
Jews, came into force.[38]
By passing this constitutional
law the President and the Assembly of the Slovak Republic authorized the
Government to resolve the situation of the Jews according to their own
conviction. Therefore, these two constitutional authorities did not interfere
in the situation of the Jews for almost a year. In fact, constitutional law
prevented the Assembly of the Slovak Republic from deliberating about
individual governmental decrees for a period of three months as the
Constitution empowered the Assembly to do in the case of “ordinary”
governmental decrees.
From September 11, 1940 until
September 11, 1941 almost no anti-Jewish regulations were passed in the form of
decrees based on this constitutional act, including decree number 198/1941 SlC
– the so-called “Jewish Code”.
After the passage of
constitutional act number 210/1940 SlC the Government passed decree number
222/1940 SlC by which the Government delegated its authority to the established
Central Economic Office (CEO).[39]
This law subsequently put in force most of the anti-Jewish agenda – including
the liquidation and aryanization of Jewish shops and enterprises according to
decree number 303/1940 SlC (the so-called “Second Aryanization Act”). Decree
number 198/1941 SlC – the so-called “Jewish Code” gave extensive authority to
some administrative offices. The Central Economic Office was given power in
aryanization and economic matters, the Ministry of Interior (newly created
Department number 14 – so-called “Jewish Department”) was authorized in the
issues of police and security. Based on this authorization both offices issued
statutes of implementation in the form of edicts published in the newspaper “Úradné
noviny”.
Until the Jewish Code was
passed the Ministry of Interior issued its statutes on the basis of act number
190/1939 SlC about public domestic administration.[40]
4.
After
September 11,1941, i.e. after the expiration of authorization of the Government
ruled by the act number 210/1940 SlC the situation went back to the same status
prior to September 11, 1940.
Regulations about the
modification of some questions about retirement insurance of Jews who were
self-employed in higher services were passed in the form of a law (act number
278/1941 SlC), as were regulations on securing husbandry at agricultural
estates maintained by Jews (act number 108/1942 SlC) as well as regulations
limiting the number of Jews for adoption (act number 138/1942 SlC).
At first the Government
enforced regulations related to the deportations based on § 22 of decree number
198/1941 (the so-called “Jewish Code”).[41]
Since the deportations of Jews brought a partial change in the provisions of
the Constitution of the Slovak Republic, they were “amended” by the enactment
of a constitutional act (Constitutional act number 68/1942 SlC)[42]
Archeographical Note
The
edition of the documents presented here is based on research done in the Slovak
National Archives (see Archives where the research was done). Only several
documents come from the Yad Vashem archives in Jerusalem.
The authors are aware that a
great number of important documents are not included in this edition. First of
all, we have found only some of the minutes from the Government; almost all of
them from 1942 have been found, but for 1943 and 1944, only a part of them can
be found. Even the minutes that have been found offer only a very succinct
account of the decisions made by the Government in the Jewish agenda, without
providing any details of the discussion raised by individual ministers about
the given question. With very few exceptions, we have not found any minutes of
the Government from 1939-1941 – or those of its deliberations about the very
significant decisions – e.g. in the case of the passing of governmental decree
number 63/1939 SlC (the definition of a Jew) or decree number 198/1941 SlC (the
so-called “Jewish Code”). Regarding the legislative process there have been
only some governmental bills published (e.g. regarding act number 113/1940 SlC
or constitutional act number 68/1942). There are no documents in this book that
would deal with the Central Economic Office that was directly under the Prime
Minister (nor are there any documents from the CEO’s predecessor – The Economic
Office of the Presidium of the Government). We are planning the publication of
a separate volume containing materials from these important offices. There are
no documents from the Ministry of Interior either (nor from Department number
14, the so-called “Jewish Department”). Documents of this provenance will be
included in at least two other volumes on Jewish labor camps and the
deportations.
Based on the available
documents we also have very little information about decisions made by
President J. Tiso. In this case we have also used several of his speeches that
were published in the press of that period.
The documents from the
Assembly of the Slovak Republic are better preserved. Most of all there are
minutes from the sessions written in shorthand, as well as many preparatory
documents (such as deliberations in individual committees). Discussions that
took place in individual committees are preserved only in a very succinct form
in the Fond of the Assembly of the Slovak Republic in the Slovak National
Archives.
The best-preserved documents
are those of the State Council. Despite the fact that this office did not have
a great deal of authority, important representatives of the state were sitting
there (e.g. the Prime Minister, V. Tuka and several other ministers – A. Mach,
F. Čatloš,
the head of the Assembly of the Slovak Republic, M. Sokol and others);
therefore, we are much better informed about their attitude towards the Jewish
question than in the case of documents from the Assembly or from the
Government.
Further research in the
archives of these institutions can then shift the picture that we are
presenting in this collection of documents.
Documents are published
according to the established rules for publishing sources concerning modern
history. They are mostly published in their full wording. Due to a lack of
space we left out introductions to the documents in cases of the shorthand
written minutes from the Assembly sessions that would be repeated in the same
wording in each document. In each case, if only a portion of the document is
published, it is noted; omissions are marked by an ellipsis (…). Any eroded or
illegible passages are marked graphically with […]. Documents are published in
their original language – in Slovak or in German, with a translation of the
German documents in footnotes. The editors sought to interfere minimally into
the text of the documents. The original spelling is preserved. Only evident
misspellings in the cases of proper names are corrected.
If the original documents were
not preserved in the archives, editors rarely used the documents published in
the press of that period (especially from the newspapers “Slovák” and “Gardista”). We have used the press mostly in the case of J. Tiso’s
speeches.
In the preparation of
footnotes the editors included them to identify persons only the first time the
name was mentioned. For this reason we advise the use of the index of names
when searching for this data.
The inner structure of the
book is based on the chronological principle. In the head of each document
there is a content annotation (in italics) that was written by the editors.
This is followed by the text of the document itself, which is then followed by
a citation of the source (archives, fond, number), which is again in italics.
The source citation includes some abbreviations that are explained in the
section on archives.
Just a note regarding the use
of the word “Jew”. In the documents the wording is preserved according to the
original spelling. In the period of the First Czecho-Slovak Republic the
lower-case form “jewish” referred to the religion (Orthodox Jews in Slovakia
were perceived in this way), while the upper-case form “Jewish” referred to the
nationality. (Zionists were perceived in this way in Slovakia). Since only a
part of the Jews acknowledged Slovak nationality, it is necessary to write
about Jews in Slovakia, not Slovak Jews.
Finally, we would like to
express our gratitude for their willingness and assistance during our research
in the Slovak National Archives in Bratislava especially to Dr. V. Vrabcová, B. Slezáková and P. Magura.
CONTENTS[43]
Document 1. An article from the Jewish Newspaper regarding an audience
given to the representatives of the Central Jewish Office by the Prime Minister
of the Autonomous Government J. Tiso in
January 1939. (25)
Document 2. The Government of the Slovak Country
on January 23, 1939 formed a committee for the solution of the Jewish question
in Slovakia. Its members were: Karol Sidor, Minister of State, Mikuláš
Pružinský, Minister of Economy, Pavel Teplánsky, Minister of Finance, Ferdinand
Ďurčanský, Minister of Transportation and Public Works, and Julius
Virsík, Attorney at Law.
(25)
Document 3. Excerpt from an article published
in the newspaper, Slovak Politics on
January 27, 1939 in which there is a declaration offered by the Prime Minister
of the Slovak Autonomous Government, J. Tiso, to foreign journalists in which
he discusses “the Jewish question”. (26)
Document 4. Excerpt from the radical speech of
representative A. Mach in Rišňovce on February 5, 1939 relating to the Jews. (27)
Document 5. Part of the Government’s
proclamation referring to the Jews, presented by the Prime Minister of the
Autonomous Government, J. Tiso, at the meeting of the Assembly on February 21,
1939. (27)
Document 6. Speeches of representatives F.
Karmasin, P. Čarnogurský, G. Rehák, V. Moravčík, J. Maguth, and A. Mach in the
Assembly of the Slovak Country on February 21- 23, 1939 relating to the
Jews. (28)
Document 7. Letter of the Presidium of the
Government to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, dated July 15, 1939, on the
issue of the regulation of Jews studying in secondary schools. (30)
Document 8. Excerpt from the shorthand written
record of the 15th session of the Assembly of the Slovak Republic in
Bratislava on Tuesday, November 21, 1939. The passage from the Government’s
proclamation on the Jewish question was presented by the vice-chairman of the
Government, F. Ďurčanský. (31)
Document 9. Undated report of the Government
citing the motivation behind the various stipulations of the Act about Jewish
Enterprises and Jewish Employees (the so-called “First Aryanization Act”). (32)
Document 10. A February 2, 1940 report of the
Economic Committee about the governmental bill about Jewish Enterprises and
Jewish Employees (the so-called “First Aryanization Act”). (37)
Document 11. Excerpt from the shorthand written
record of the 26th session of the Assembly of the Slovak Republic
from February 22, 1940 where they deliberated on the law about land reform that
legitimized the aryanization of Jewish land.
(38)
Document 12. A February 23, 1940 report of the
Assembly of the Slovak Republic’s Committee on Constitutional Law on the
governmental bill about Jewish Enterprises and Jewish Employees (the so-called
First Aryanization Act). (40)
Document 13. Excerpt from the shorthand written
record of the 27th session of the Assembly of the Slovak Republic
from February 29, 1940, in which the Jewish Enterprises and Jewish Employees
Act was passed. (42)
Document
14. A March 19, 1940 letter of President J. Tiso, Prime Minister V.
Tuka, and Minister of Economy G. Medrický to the chairman of the Assembly of
the Slovak Republic, M. Sokol, with objections to the prepared law about Jewish
Enterprises and Jewish Employees in these enterprises. (69)
Document 15. Minutes from the meeting of the
Economic Committee and the Committee on Constitutional Law of the Assembly of
the Slovak Republic from April 11, 1940 in which they deliberated on objections
raised by President J. Tiso to the Jewish Enterprises and Jewish Employees Act.
(70)
Document 16. The Government’s approval of the
re-education of the Jews who want to emigrate, dated April 20, 1940. (73)
Document 17. Excerpt from the shorthand written
record of the 33rd session of the Assembly of the Slovak Republic
from April 25, 1940. The report of the Committee on Constitutional Law and
Economic Committee responding to the President’s objections to the draft of the
Jewish Enterprises and Jewish Employees Act. (74)
Document 18. A May 8, 1940 ruling of the
Government of the Slovak Republic that only written interventions regarding
aryanization and Jewish issues will be accepted. (80)
Document 19. Report to the bill about the
listing of the Jewish property from August 22, 1940 signed by the Minister of
Economy G. Medrický. (81)
Document 20. Prime Minister V. Tuka’s proposal
about establishing the Jewish ghetto in Slovakia, sent to the Ministry of
Interior on August 26, 1940. (82)
Document 21. Undated report of the government’s
bill regarding the repurchase of Jewish realties bought by the Jews at the
executory auction. (83)
Document 22. Undated governmental bill of the
constitutional law conferring the Government with the authority to solve the
Jewish question. (85)
Document 23. A September 3, 1940 report of the
Committee on Constitutional Law concerning the governmental bill entrusting the
Government with the power to solve the Jewish question. (87)
Document 24. Excerpt from the shorthand written
record of the 43rd session of the Assembly of the Slovak Republic of
September 3, 1940, which passed Constitutional Act number 210, entrusting the
Government with the power to solve the Jewish question for one year, as well as
the Act about the Repurchase of the Jewish Real Estates bought by the Jews at
the executory auction.
(88)
Document 25. A September 6, 1940 letter of the
Presidium of the Government to the Assembly of the Slovak Republic justifying
the passage of a decree with the power of law about the listing of Jewish
property. (102)
Document 26. Extract from the speech of
President J. Tiso at the rally in Višňové about the Jewish question, published
in the newspaper Slovák on September
24 – 25, 1940. (103)
Document 27. Extract from the speech of
President J. Tiso at a celebration in Ružomberok about the Jewish question that was published in the newspaper Slovák on October 1, 1940. (104)
Document 28. An October 18, 1940 letter of the
Presidium of the Government to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs asking for the
intervention on behalf of the Jews in Nazi Germany who are Slovak
citizens. (104)
Document 29. December 3, 1940 intervention
based on the order of President J. Tiso concerning the issue of aryanization.
(105)
Document 30. December 21, 1940 intervention
based on the order of President J. Tiso concerning the issue of aryanization.
(106)
Document 31. Excerpt from the minutes and a
shorthand written record of the February 12, 1941 session of the State Council
in which the deliberation about the Jewish question took place. The chairman of
the Central Economic Office A. Morávek presented a report. (107)
Document 32. Comments of the vice chairman of
the State Council B. Klima and the opinion of the State Council on the report
of A. Morávek. (122)
Document 33. An April 7, 1941 request of Office
of President J. Tiso to the Central Economic Office for information about the
aryanization. (123)
Document 34. Excerpt from a shorthand written
record of the April 25, 1941 session of the State Council containing a
discussion on the issue of Jews who had been baptized. (123)
Document 35. Excerpt from the May 1941 report
about the working of the State Land Office that was prepared for the State
Council regarding the issue of Jewish land. (124)
Document
36. Two documents concerning the working duty of the baptized Jews. (127)
Document 37. August 20, 1941 comments of
President J. Tiso on the draft of the definition of the term “Jew”. A reply of
the Presidium of the Government to J. Tiso on his comments. These documents
originated before the passage of decree 198/1941 SlC, the so-called “Jewish
Code”.
(128)
Document 38. Information about aryanization
from the Presidium of the Government, dated August 27, 1941, sent to President
J. Tiso. (132)
Document 39. President J. Tiso on the Jewish
question on September 18, 1941.
(132)
Document 40. October 31, 1941 letter of the
State Council to President J. Tiso concerning the legal status of the Jews.
This letter is a reaction to the racial definition of the term “Jew” based on
decree number 198/1941 SlC – the so-called “Jewish Code”. (133)
Document 41. A November 6, 1941 letter of the
Presidium of the Government to the Ministry of Interior concerning the payment
of the expenses of the Jewish concentration camps in Slovakia. (135)
Document 42. On November 25, 1941 the Ministry
of Foreign Affairs informed the Presidium of the Slovak Government, the
Ministry of Interior, the Ministry of Economy, the Ministry of Finance, the
Central Economic Office, and the Slovak National Bank that on November 21, 1941
they had been informed by the Germans about the preparations for the
deportation of the Jews. The German party asked Slovakia to express their
opinion on the deportation of the Jews who are Slovak citizens from Nazi
Germany and from the Protectorate of Czech and Moravia as soon as
possible. (136)
Document 43. A December 10, 1041 Government
ruling about extending the period for the practice of Jewish physicians. (137)
Document 44. Excerpt from a shorthand written
record of the 77th session of the December 18, 1941 Assembly of the
Slovak Republic. The report of the Committee on the Constitutional Law, Social,
and Health Committees about the governmental bill modifying the questions of
the retirement insurance of the Jews, who are private employees in higher
service. (137)
Document 45. Letter of the Slovak Embassy in
Berlin to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Bratislava about negotiations
concerning the deportation of Jews from Slovakia. The letter mentions an
agreement reached on December 2, 1941 in which the Slovak Government agreed to
the deportation of the Slovak Jews residing in the Third Reich (including the
Protectorate of Czech and Moravia as well as the so-called “Ostmark”, i.e.
former Austria). (139)
Document 46. Excerpt from the minutes of the
Government from February 11, 1942 concerning Jews. (141)
Document 47. Excerpt from the minutes of the
Government from March 3, 1942 where the Prime Minister V. Tuka and the Minister
of Interior A. Mach informed the members of the Government that Jews will be
deported from Slovakia. (142)
Document 48. A March 4, 1942 letter of the
Presidium of the Government to the Central Economic Office about the
Government’s ruling on the confiscation of Jewish stamp collections. (143)
Document 49. The Presidium of the Government’s
March 5, 1942 statute to the Central Economic Office for aryanizers to levy a
part of the break-up value of the aryanized enterprises. (143)
Document 50. Excerpt from the minutes from the
March 6, 1942 session of the State Council in which Prime Minister V. Tuka
announced the deportation of Jews, that Slovakia will pay 500 RM (Reich Marks)
for each deported person and that deported Jews will cease to be citizens of
the Slovak Republic. (146)
Document 51. A March 19, 1942 letter of the
Ministry of Defence to the Central Economic Office about the transfer of Jewish
movables to the army. (148)
Document 52. A March 25, 1942 letter of the
Presidium of the Government to the Ministry of Interior about loaning of the
deportations of the Jews. (148)
Document
53. Abstract from the minutes of the Government from March 24, 1942 in
which deliberations on the text of the constitutional act about the
expatriation of Jews, which was submitted to the Assembly of the Slovak
Republic, took place. (149)
Document 54. A March 25, 1942 letter of the
Presidium of the Slovak Government to the Presidium of the Assembly of the
Slovak Republic informing them about delivering the governmental bill of the
constitutional act about the expatriation of Jews. The Government asks the
Assembly to deliberate on the constitutional act as soon as possible because
the deportations will start in the immediate future. (150)
Document 55. A March 24, 1942 governmental bill
and the rationale behind the constitutional act about the expatriation of the
Jews; it is signed by the Minister of Interior A. Mach. (151)
Document 56. A March 1942 governmental bill
about disciplining Jews by caning. (152)
Document 57. Minutes from the March 26, 1942
session of the State Council deliberating on the Jewish question. The chairman
of the Central Economic Office, A. Morávek, presented a report at this meeting
in which he informed the State Council about the progress of aryanization and
liquidation of the Jewish firms and shops. There was a discussion among the
members of the State Council about the Jewish issue or rather about the
prepared deportations. (153)
Document 58. A March 26, 1942 letter of the
State Council to President J. Tiso asking him to handle the requests of
baptized Jews for dispensations so that the authorities would then know whom
they can deport. (178)
Document 59. A March 26, 1942 letter of the
State Council to the Presidium of the Government about deportations. (179)
Document
60. General part of the rationale on the governmental bill about the
Fund for establishing and running the enterprises for working duty of Jews from
April 1, 1942. This rationale contains information on the pauperization of Jews
resulting from the liquidation and aryanization of the Jewish shops,
enterprises and firms. (180)
Document 61. The minutes from negotiations
between Prime Minister V. Tuka and H. Himmler’s deputy about the deportations
of Jews. (181)
Document 62. Extract from the minutes from the
Government’s session of April 22, 1942. (182)
Document 63. The Government’s April 22, 1942 ruling
concerning Jewish lawyers. (183)
Document 64. Extract from the minutes and from
a shorthand record of the State Council’s meeting of April 29, 1942. (184)
Document 65. A May 5, 1942 letter of Prime
Minister V. Tuka to the chairman of the Assembly of the Slovak Republic M.
Sokol that was written as an attachment to the German verbal note sent by V.
Tuka on May 1, 1942. (194)
Document 66. Extract from the minutes of the
Government from May 7, 1942. (195)
Document 67. The May 11, 1942 report of the
Assembly of the Slovak Republic’s Committee on Constitutional Law to the
constitutional act about the expatriation of Jews. (197)
Document 68. A May 13, 1942 official report
from the Secretariat of the Assembly of the Slovak Republic in which J.
Martinka conveyed additional remarks of Prime Minister V. Tuka concerning the
constitutional act about the expatriation of Jews. (198)
Document 69. Extract from the minutes of the
Government from May 15, 1942 where the Government took a stand on modifications
enacted in the Assembly of the Slovak Republic’s Committee on Constitutional
Law to the prepared constitutional act about the expatriation of Jews. (199)
Document 70. Letter of Prime Minister V. Tuka
to the chairman of the Assembly of the Slovak Republic M. Sokol with remarks of
the Government from its session on May 15, 1942. These remarks differ from the
ones written in the minutes from the Government’s session of May 15, 1942. (199)
Document 71. Shorthand written record of the 87th
session of the May 15, 1942 Assembly of the Slovak Republic which passed
Constitutional Act number 68/1942 SlC about the Expatriation of Jews, which
became a legal ground for the deportations of Jews. (200)
Document 72. A May 22, 1942 letter of the
President’s Office informing the Presidium of the Government about the
transmission of a copy of the constitutional act signed by the President. (205)
Document 73. Extract from the minutes of the
Government’s May 22, 1942 session in which the Government entrusted the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs with enforcing the resolution of the Assembly of
the Slovak Republic to the constitutional act about the deportations of Jews. (206)
Document 74. Extract from the minutes and a
shorthand record of the State Council’s May 27, 1942 session deliberating on the issues of Jewish
physicians and revisions of aryanization. (206)
Document 75. Extract from the minutes of the
Government’s May 29, 1942 session in which the Minister of Interior agreed with
the Minister of Education to refrain from deporting teachers of Jewish schools
before July 31, 1942. (214)
Document 76. A May 29, 1942 letter of the State
Council to the Ministry of Interior concerning Jewish physicians. (215)
Document 77. Extract from the minutes of the
June 10, 1942 Government’s session concerning Jews. (216)
Document 78. Extract from the shorthand record
of the 91st session of the June 16, 1942 Assembly of the Slovak
Republic. Report of the Committee on Constitutional Law and Economic Committee
on the governmental bill about ensuring farming of the land estates maintained
by Jews. (217)
Document 79. Extract from the minutes of the
June 18, 1942 Government’s session.
(219)
Document 80. Slovak verbal note from June 23,
1942 containing the agreement to the payment of 500 RM for each deported
Jew. (220)
Document
81. Extract from the minutes of the Government’s June 24, 1942 session
containing a description of the course of preparation of the governmental bill
executing some regulations of Constitutional Act 68/1942; the Government agreed
that in some special cases the parents of the Jews who have been granted
dispensation do not have to be deported.
(220)
Document 82. Extract from the minutes and
shorthand record of the State Council’s June 24, 1942 session where they
observed the decree executing Constitutional Act number 68/1942 SlC about the
Expatriation of Jews. (221)
Document 83. Extract from the shorthand record
of the 92nd session of the July 2, 1942 Assembly of the Slovak Republic.
Report of the Committee on Constitutional Law on the governmental bill about
restriction of Jews in cases of adoption. (223)
Document 84. Extract from the minutes of the
July 8, 1942 Government’s session.
(225)
Document 85. Extract from the minutes of the
July 18, 1942 Government’s session.
(225)
Document
86. Extract from the minutes of the August 11,1942 Government’s session
in which they deliberated about further preparations for deportations. (226)
Document 87. Extract from President J. Tiso’s
speech in Holíč in August 1942 where he spoke about the Jewish question. (227)
Document 88. Extract from the minutes of the
September 11, 1942 Government’s session. (228)
Document 89. A part of the protocol from the 5th
common meeting of German and Slovak Governmental Committees from September 10 –
30, 1942 regarding the payment of 500 RM for each deported Jew. (229)
Document 90. Extract from the shorthand record
of the 95th session of the September 30, 1942 Assembly of the Slovak
Republic. Report of the Committee on Constitutional Law on the governmental
bill establishing a curator for the liquidation of attorney’s offices in the
case of Jewish lawyers who were wiped away from the list of attorneys. (230)
Document 91. Extract from the shorthand record
of the 96th session of the October 8, 1942 Assembly of the Slovak
Republic. Report of the Committee on Constitutional Law on the governmental
bill about awarding claims and demands against the state ensuing from the
translation of Jewish property to the state. (231)
Document 92. Extract from the minutes of the October 13,
1942 Government’s session. (233)
Document 93. An October 15, 1942 letter of the Ministry of
Finance to the Ministry of Interior regarding payments for the deportees. (234)
Document 94. An October 15, 1942 letter of the Presidium of the Ministry of Interior
to the Ministry of Finance reporting the number of the deported Jews as
57,628. (234)
Document 95. An October 27, 1942 letter of
Prime Minister V. Tuka to the Minister of Economy G. Medrický concerning the
questionnaires about Jews. (235)
Document 96. An October 28, 1942 letter of the
Ministry of Finance to the Presidium of the Government about technical details
of payments for the deported Jews. (236)
Document 97. Extract from the minutes of the
November 4, 1942 Government’s session. (238)
Document 98. A November 5, 1942 letter of the
Presidium of the Government to the Ministry of Finance conveying the
Government’s approval, given on November 4, 1942, to the transfer of deposits
of the Fund for Supporting the Expatriation of Jews to a special account of the
Ministry of Finance, thus making it possible to use this money to pay for the
deportations. (239)
Document 99. Extract from the minutes of the
December 2, 1942 Government’s session. (240)
Document 100. Extract from the shorthand record
of the 104th session of the December 22, 1942 Assembly of the Slovak
Republic. Report of the Committee on Constitutional Law on the governmental
bill modifying the Act about awarding claims and demands against the state
ensuing from the transfer of Jewish property to the state. (241)
Document 101. Extract from the minutes of the
January 15, 1943 Government’s session. (244)
Document 102. Extract from the minutes of the February 1,
1943 Government’s session. (245)
Document 103. Extract from the minutes and the
shorthand record of the February 3, 1943 State Council’s session in which the
head of the 14th Department of the Ministry of Interior (the
so-called “Jewish Department”), A. Vašek, presented a report about Jewish
issues. It was followed by discussion on the Jewish issues. (246)
Document 104. Extract from the minutes of the
February 23, 1943 Government’s session. (256)
Document 105. Undated proposal of the Ministry
of Interior for the solution of the Jewish question (probably from March
1943). (256)
Document 106. Extract from the minutes of the
March 30, 1943 Government’s session. (258)
Document 107. Undated proposal of the Ministry
of Interior for the further solution of the Jewish question (preparation of
additional deportations). (258)
Document 108. An April 9, 1943 letter of the
Presidium of the Government to all the Ministries containing the Government’s
directives of April 8, 1943 regarding the Jewish question associated with the
next stage of deportations. (259)
Document 109. An April 14, 1943 letter of the
Minister of Interior A. Mach to the Presidium of the Ministry of Economy about
the Government’s resolution about Jewish dispensations. (260)
Document
110. Extract from the minutes of the May 12, 1943 State Council’s
session. The chairman of the Central Economic Office Ľudovít Paškovič presented
a report on the issue of aryanization. (262)
Document 111. A May 13, 1943 letter of the
Presidium of the Government to all the ministers asking them to prepare reports
for the next Government’s session about excluding Jews from economic and public
life. (274)
Document 112. Extract from the minutes of the
May 15, 1943 Government’s session. (275)
Document 113. A June 11, 1943 letter of Prime
Minister V. Tuka to the Minister of Economy G. Medrický about the Jewish
dispensations. (275)
Document 114. Extract from the minutes of the
June 22, 1943 Government’s session. (276)
Document 115. Extract from the minutes of the August
10, 1943 Government’s session in which the Minister of Interior A. Mach
announced that the deportations would not continue. (277)
Document 116. Minutes from the session of the
common committee of the Assembly of the Slovak Republic of September 3, 1943 in
which the members deliberated on the Jewish question and the definition of a
Jew. (278)
Document 117. Extract from the minutes of the
September 9, 1943 Government’s session. (279)
Document 118. An October 1, 1943 letter of the
Secretariat of the Ministry of Interior to the 14th Department (to
A. Vašek) about the dialogue between the Minister of Interior A. Mach and
President J. Tiso. One of the outcomes of this dialogue were preparations for
the establishment of a new Jewish detention camp. (280)
Document 119. Extract from the shorthand record
of the 121th session of the September 28, 1943 Assembly of the
Slovak Republic in which the so-called “Jewish Code” was modified. (281)
Document 120. A December 13, 1943 letter of the
Presidium of the Government to the Presidiums of the Ministry of Economy and
the Ministry of Finance about Jewish houses. (292)
Document 121. A December 21, 1943 letter of the
Ministry of Finance to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs mentioning the payment
of 200 million crowns to Nazi Germany for the expenses for the deportation of
Jews from Slovakia in 1942. (292)
Document 122. Record of the meeting between
President J. Tiso and a Nazi diplomat Veesenmayer on December 22, 1943. (293)
Document 123. Extract from the minutes of the March 21,1944
Government’s session. (295)
Document 124. Extract from the minutes of the Committee of
Economic Ministers’ session of March 23, 1944. (295)
Document 125. Extract from the minutes of the April 26, 1944
Government’s session. (297)
Document 126. Extract from the minutes of the Committee of
Economic Ministers’ session of May 16, 1944. (298)
Document 127. Extract from the minutes of the May 31, 1944
Government’s session. (299)
Document 128. Governmental proposal for the
Assembly resolution agreeing with the June 7, 1944 verbal note regarding
payments for the deportation of Jews in 1942. (300)
Document 129. A July 14, 1944 letter of the
Government to the Presidium of the Ministry of Economy about using Jewish
deposits for the payment of damage caused by the Allies’ air raids against
Slovakia. (302)
Document 130. Extract from the minutes of the August 8, 1944
Government’s session. (302)
Document 131. Extract from the minutes of the September 11,
1944 Government’s session. (303)
Document 132. Extract from the minutes of the
September 15, 1944 Government’s session. (303)
Document 133. Extract from the minutes of the
October 2, 1944 Government’s session. (304)
Document 134. Extract from the governmental program of Prime
Minister Štefan Tiso of
October 4, 1944 which he presented at the 141st session of the
Assembly of the Slovak Republic. (304)
Document 135. An October 8, 1944 letter of President J. Tiso
to Pope Pius XII about the Jewish question. (305)
Document 136. Extract from the minutes of the
November 13, 1944 Government’s session. (306)
Document 137. A November 13, 1944 letter of the
Ministry of Defence to the Civic Notary Office in Bratislava serving notice of
the concentration of Jews. (307)
Document 138. Extract from the minutes of the
November 22, 1944 Government’s session. (308)
Document 139. A November 27, 1944 letter of Archbishop Eidem
of Uppsala to President J. Tiso. (309)
Document 140. A January 4, 1945 letter of
President J. Tiso to Archbishop Eidem of Uppsala. (309)
Document 141. Extract from the minutes of the
January 30, 1945 Government’s session. (310)
[1] Slovak National Archives (SNA), Fond Ministry of Interior, 23619/1939,
Instruction published by the Ministry of Interior for the District offices from
October 1939.
[2] Minutes from the Assembly of
the Slovak Republic (hereafter TS SSR) written in shorthand. 27th
plenary session, February 29, 1940. Regarding the beginnings of the Holocaust see
NIŽNANSKY, E.: The Jewish Community in Slovakia between the Czecho-Slovak
Parliamentary Democracy and Slovak State in the Context of Central Europe.
Prešov 1999.
[3] Nástup, February 1, 1939; Slovák,
November 30 1938.
[4] See also documents number 9,10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17.
[5] Slovak Code of Law 1940, act 46/1940 SlC; act 113/1940 SlC;
constitutional act 210/1940 SlC – see also documents number 22,23, 24; Slovak
Code of Law 1942, constitutional act 68/1942 SlC – see also documents number
54,55, 65, 67,68,69,70, 71, 72. NIŽŇANSKÝ, E.: Deportations of Jews from
Slovakia in 1942 and passing of constitutional act number 68/1942 about “resettlement of Jews“.
In: Studia historica Nitriensia
X/2002, 85-156.
[6] TS SSR, 41st plenary session, July 4, 1940
[7] SNA, Fond National Court (NS), Dr. Karol Mederly, Tnľud 15/47.
[8] TS SSR, 96th plenary session, December 8, 1942
[9] SNA, Fond “The Assembly of the Slovak Republic”; deliberations of the
committees, without number, box 272 (number of the box is not in accordance
with the reality because in the course of preparations of this book the
reconstruction of this fond was undertaken and the boxes were renumbered –
I.K., E.N.) See document number 116.
[10] See KAMENEC, I.: The Assembly of the Slovak Republic and its Attitude
towards the Problem of the Jewish Citizens in Slovakia in the Period 1939-1945.
In: Historický časopis 17, 1969,
issue 3, 329-362.
[11] Gardista, September 14, 1941. The article of J. Martinka, the head of the Legislative
Assembly of the Presidium of the Government.
[12] Slovak Code of Law 1939, act 1/1939 SlC.
[13] Slovak Code of Law 1939, act 185/1939 SlC.
[14] Slovak Code of Law 1940, constitutional law 210/1940 SlC
[15] TS SSR, 43rd plenary session, September 3, 1940.
[16] Slovak Code of Law 1941, decree
198/1941 SlC
[17] SNA, Fond NS, Július Stano, Tnľud 2/46.
[18] For more details see Nižňanský, E. - Kamenec, I.: Payments for the
Deported Slovak Jews. In: Historický
časopis, 51, 2003, issue 2, 311-342. NIŽŇANSKÝ, E.: Deportations of the
Jews from Slovakia in 1942 and Passing of Constitutional Law number 68/1942 about the “resettlement of
Jews”. In: Studia historica Nitriensia X/2002, 85-156.
[19] SNA, Fond NS, Dr. Anton Vašek, Tnľud 17/46; Slovák, June 7 1944.
[20] E.g. The speech of A. Mach at the regional convention in Ružomberok in
February 1943. “(…) One of our first duties after we have eliminated 80% of
Jews will be to deal with the rest of them. Everybody can see what these 20
thousand Jews we still have here mean . If they are baptized or not, if they
have the identification of this or that kind – all of them follow the same aim.
But March and April will come and transports will leave (…)”. Gardista, February 9, 1943.
[21] For more details see documents number 105, 107, 108, 109, 111, 112,
115.
[22] See documents number 131,132, 133, 134, 137.
[23] For details see document number 14.
[24] Including governmental decree number 63/1939 SlC, where there is also
included the definition of a Jew.
[25] For details see documents number 37 and 38.
[26] Slovák, August10, 1940.
[27] SNA, Fond NS Dr. Jozef Tiso, Tnľud 6/46, Reports of the Slovak Press
Agency
[28] Slovák, March 16, 1939.
[29] Vatican and Slovak Republic (1939/1945). Documents. (Editors: Kamenec,
I.-Prečan, V. - Škorvánek S.) Bratislava 1992. Document number 138, 207-208.
For details see document number 134.
[30] For details see KAMENEC, I.: The State Council in the Political System
of the Slovak State in 1939-1945. In: Historický
časopis 44, 1996, issue 2, 221-242.
[31] SNA, Fond Slovakia (S), 99-6; Fond S, 101-4.
[32] SNA, Fond NS, Otomar Kubala, Tnľud. 13/46, the minutes from the State
Council meetings.
[33] SNA, Fond NS, Dr. Karol Mederly, Tnľud 15/47, the minutes from the
State Council meetings; Fond S, 102-103.
[34] For more details see document number 57.
[35] SNA, Fond NS, Dr. Viktor Ravasz, Tnľud 22/45 , the minutes from the
State Council meetings.
[36] Slovak Code of 1939. 1st law from March 14, 1939 about the
independent Slovak State.
(…) § 4.
Government is empowered through its
decrees to enact all that is necessary for preservation of the order and
securing the interests of the Slovak State in this transitional period.
[37] Slovak
Code of 1939. Constitutional law number 185/1939 Sl. C. (…) § 44.
(1) If in order to forestall irrecoverable damage, the important
economic, financial or political interests of the state require immediate
measures, the Government can pass them in the form of a decree with the force
of the law with the exception of the issues that belong to the sole authority
of the Assembly or that according to the Constitution should be ruled by the
law.
(2) This decree is valid only after being signed by the majority of the
members of the Government as well as by the President.
(3)The decree with the force of the law simultaneously with its
proclamation will be presented to the Assembly by the Prime Minister. The
Assembly can in three months period express their disagreement with the decree
that is to be declared according to § 29 with stating of the day
when the decree loses its force or they can modify the decree and pass it as a
law.
[38] Slovak Code of 1940. Constitutional law number 210/1940 SlC
§ 1
(1) The Government is authorized to undertake through the decrees all
the necessary measures:
a) to exclude Jews from Slovak economic and social life;
b) to pass the Jewish property into the
ownership of Christians;
(2) This authorization according to the par. 1 is valid for one year
from the day of this law coming into force.
§ 2
The decrees passed in accordance with § 1 have the force of the
laws and they are signed by the Prime Minister and the respective Minister.
They are declared as laws. (…).
[39] Slovak Code of 1940. Decree
number 222/1940 SlC (…) § 2. (1) Central Economic Office is in charge of
enacting all that is necessary, according to the special regulations, to
exclude Jews from Slovak economic and social life and to pass the Jewish
property into the ownership of Christians.
[40] Slovak Code of 1940. Act number 190/1939 SlC. In § 2 of
this law it is stated:
(1) Ministry of Interior and the subordinate offices of the domestic
public administration are bound to watch over the public order, peace, public
safety, morality, to ward off all the danger of this nature and eliminate all
the existing disorder, if there are or will be no other offices or authorities
entrusted with this task.
(2) If the regulations that have already been passed do not sufficiently
protect public interests, the Ministry of Interior and the regional offices are
allowed to issue for the specific cases prescripts and prohibitions in the form
of general regulations that are needed in the public interest and they can
order statutory fine from 10.00 crowns to 5,000.00 crowns or imprisonment from
12 hours up to 14 days and it can be also in the case that valid regulations
rule the low punishment. Irrecoverable mulct should be changed into
imprisonment for not more than 14 days.
(3) The prescripts and bans issued by the regional offices come to force
only after their approval by the Ministry of Interior. In emergency and urgent
cases the regional offices as well as the district offices can issue such
prescripts and bans with additional approval of the Minister of Interior. If
the Minister does not approve these regulations (prescripts and bans) in the
course of 30 days, their validity will expire.
[41] Slovak Code of Law 1941.
Ordinance number 198/1941 SlC (…) Compulsory labour service. § 22.
(1)Jews aged between 16 and 60, if they do not perform labour according
§ 38 of the Defence Act are bound to perform works ordered to them by the
Ministry of Interior
(2)Ministry of Interior provides jobs or organizes work and ordains
working conditions for the above-mentioned persons in article 1.
(3)Regulations in the 1st paragraph do not apply to the Jews
who have the permission according to § 43, article 1 or those who according to
§ 258, article 2 can stay in their present occupation, as well as those to whom
apply the provisions § 256, as long as the due permission or dispensation is
still valid.
[42] For more details see documents number 54, 55, 65, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71,
72.
[43] Abbreviation
SlC means Slovak Code of Law.